Programme année universitaire 2021-2022

Premier semestre

• 17 septembre 2021 : Journée d'étude Généalogies de la liberté d’expression (III) : XVIIIe siècle
  Participants : Philippe Audegean (Sorbonne Université), Luigi Delia (Bourgogne), Claude Gautier (ENS de Lyon), Johanna Lenne-Cornuez (Sorbonne Université), François Quastana (Aix-Marseille)
   
• 24 septembre 2021 : Panel La liberté d’expression en conflits aux 1ères Rencontres de la SFPJ
  Participants : Pierre Auriel (Lyon 3), Gwénaële Calvès (CYU), Cécile Degiovanni (Oxford), Charles Girard (Lyon 3), Thomas Hochmann (Paris Nanterre), Alexandre Palanco (UCLy), Mathilde Unger (Strasbourg)
   
• 11 octobre 2021, 14h-16h : Pierre Auriel, Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3
  Aux racines de la liberté d’expression en Europe : la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme.
   
• 22 octobre 2021, 16h-18h : Russell Weaver, University of Louisville
  Robotic Speech and the First Amendment
   
• 15 novembre 2021, 14h-16h : Tarlach McGonagle, Universiteit Leiden (en ligne)
  Equality of access and equality of participation: the lodestars or unreachable stars of public debate ?
   
• 29 novembre 2021, 14h-16h : Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Institut des sciences juridiques de l’Académie polonaise des sciences (en ligne)
  Freedom of expression versus illiberal tendencies in postcommunist states after 1989 transitions?
   
• 13 décembre 2021, 14h-16h : Nicoletta Perlo, Université Toulouse 1 Capitole (à Paris, Maison de la Recherche)
  Les juges et la liberté d’expression en Italie
   

Second semestre

• lundi 31 janvier 2022, 16h-18h (en ligne) : Peter Niesen, Université de Hambourg
  Kant and Rawls on Free Speech in Autocracies
  
  In the works of Kant and Rawls, we find an acute sensibility to the pre-eminent importance of freedom of speech. Both authors defend free speech in democratic societies as a private and as a public entitlement, but their conceptions markedly differ when applied to non-liberal and non-democratic societies. The difference is that freedom of speech, for Kant, is a universal claim that can serve as a test of legitimacy of all legal orders, while for Rawls, some legal orders are owed full recognition even if they do not in principle guarantee freedom of speech. I explain Kant’s account of free political speech and argue that the defence of individual rights should be seen as its core feature, both in republican and in autocratic states. I then argue that a much-overlooked shift in Rawls’s development to Political Liberalism likewise ties his account of free speech in democratic societies to issues concerning rights and justice. In a next step, I discuss Rawls’s perspective on some non-democratic regimes in his Law of Peoples, regimes that he understands as well-ordered but which do not guarantee freedom of speech. I criticize Rawls’s account from Kant’s perspective and suggest to introduce a ‘module’ from Kant’s pre-republican thought into Rawls’s conception, aiming to secure a core area of rights- and justice-related speech. My claim is that under Kant’s view of autocratic legitimacy, an important extension of speech rights is called for even in non-liberal, non-democratic states, and that a Rawlsian account should and can adopt it.
   
• lundi 7 mars 2022, 14h-16h : Gregory Bligh, Science Po Lyon
  La distinction entre liberté d’expression et liberté d’opinion à l’aune du droit de la fonction publique
  Lieu : Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3 (salle de la Rotonde, 18 rue Chevreul, Lyon 7e).

Séminaire organisé à l’Institut de Recherches Philosophiques de Lyon, Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3 par Pierre Auriel (IRPhiL, Lyon 3), Charles Girard (IRPhiL, Lyon 3) et Clotilde Nouët (Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique) dans le cadre du programme EGALIBEX (ANR JCJC 2018) et du programme "La liberté d’expression : généalogies, modèles, institutions" (COMOD).

► Infos + : https://egalibex.univ-lyon3.fr/seminaire/